Mentee Instruction Guide

Mentee Instruction Guide

This elaborate guide on instructional leadership incorporates the vital elements of instruction, curriculum, and assessment for improvement. As such, it aims to help junior school leaders in the school or district perform their duties and improve students’ achievement.

Evaluating Leadership Skills for Effective Instructional Planning

The concept of instructional leadership entails a complex of skills and competencies that influential school leaders need. Focusing on developing the following essential leadership skills is, therefore, recommended:

1. Vision and Goal-Setting: Define and communicate the expectations for teaching quality and connect your school’s objectives to the process of ongoing quality enhancement (Lambrecht et al., 2022).
2. Instructional Expertise: Enhance knowledge of effective strategies in teaching and learning to effectively guide and assess students (Marsh & Farrell, 2015).
3. Data-Driven Decision-Making: Acquire the competencies for interpreting and applying student outcomes data to teaching practice and decision-making (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
4. Collaborative Leadership: Encourage learner involvement and group work so that they can be held responsible for the success of the instruction (Lambrecht et al., 2022).
5. Continuous Learning: Support the development of others and provide a model of learning by personally seeking professional learning opportunities and pursuing growth in your practice (Marsh & Farrell, 2015).

Critiquing Professional Learning Strategies for Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

Proper professional learning strategies in relation to curriculum, instruction, and assessment are crucial. Accordingly, when critiquing these strategies, consider the following:

1. Curriculum Alignment: Ensure that the curriculum is relevant to the state or district requirements, thus offering students a smooth and well-coordinated learning process (Marsh & Farrell, 2015).
2. Instructional Strategies: Use several techniques of instruction in the classroom to achieve the diverse learning needs of students and to create meaningful interaction and learning (Marsh & Farrell, 2015).
3. Assessment Practices: Stress the effectiveness of the formative and summative assessments in monitoring students’ progress, learning, and teaching needs (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
4. Collaborative Learning: Create a culture of collaboration with fellow teachers on how best to teach students to come up with joint assessment tools and methods of addressing challenges (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
5. Continuous Improvement: Promote a culture of learning which implies that there is always a process of evaluation of the practices that are being adopted in the classroom, analysis of the changes that are needed to improve the delivery of students, and then coming up with ways of achieving the change (Kumar et al., 2013).

Recommending Data Analytics for Student Achievement and Organizational Data

Decision-making is an essential factor that should underpin instructional leadership in any learning institution. In this regard, the following data analytics strategies are recommended to support instructional leadership:

1. Student-Level Data: Establish ways of tracking student-specific information such as attendance, behavior, and academic performance to determine the student’s needs for improvement or areas of excellence (Romero & Ventura, 2020).
2. School-Level Data: Examine different aggregate records of the school, including overall student performance, graduation rates, and suspension and expulsions records, in an effort to look for patterns (Marsh & Farrell, 2015).
3. Longitudinal Data: Use growth data to assess the student’s learning development over time, evaluate the efficiency of the teaching methods, and make evidence-based decisions concerning the changes in curriculum and programs (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
4. Disaggregated Data: Analyze data by subgroups like race, SES, and language to understand equal opportunity and support for all students (Romero & Ventura, 2020).
5. Data Visualization: Use data visualization in a way that is easy for teachers and administrators to comprehend and use the insights gathered from the compiled data (Romero & Ventura, 2020).

Leading the Development of Data Teams

An approach to leading the development of data teams for the purpose of promoting organizational learning and knowledge acquisition would involve the following:

1. Establishing Data Teams: Select and mobilize a group of teachers and administrators to constitute the data team in charge of gathering, analyzing, and interpreting data (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
2. Collaborative Data Analysis: Engage the data team in weekly meetings where they work together to review the data, discuss the findings, strengths, and areas that need improvement, and make action plans (Schildkamp et al., 2019).
3. Knowledge Sharing: Promote the data team’s findings and suggested practices among the school community to increase awareness and effective use of data (Kumar et al., 2013).
4. Professional Development: Support the data team through professional development activities that would help them use data in decision-making for learning and teaching (Romero & Ventura, 2020).
5. Continuous Refinement: Continuously review and update the data team practices and procedures based on the school or district’s needs (Schildkamp et al., 2019).

Recommendation of Assessment Practices for and of Learning in PK-12 Environments

Effective formative and summative assessment procedures are crucial for understanding students’ learning and for the improvement of the learning process. In my capacity as a mentor, several assessment strategies are recommended. First, it is crucial to use a balanced and fair assessment system that includes formative, interim, and summative assessments so as to give a complete picture of the student’s achievements (Schildkamp et al., 2019). In addition, this helps educators obtain information on the student’s learning process at some stages and, therefore, make proper instructional choices.

Additionally, the use of realistic and practical formative and summative assessments that enable students to show how they can apply their learning is commended (Marsh & Farrell, 2015). These assessments are not the primary multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, or true or false type of tests and are helpful in understanding the students’ thinking process. Also, it is crucial to differentiate the assessments to cater to the different learners’ abilities and provide a level playing ground for all the learners (Hollingsworth, 2019). Therefore, modifying the assessment procedures and approaches allows for identifying the achievements of all students and addressing the problems regarding their learning if necessary.

Another element is the timely and specific feedback to students, which enables them to be responsible for their learning and to establish personal goals (Schildkamp et al., 2019). This makes the feedback to be more constructive, where students can assess their strengths and weaknesses and participate in their learning process. Finally, common assessments can help teachers establish close ties and ensure that they are on the same page in terms of the expectations for students’ learning (Schildkamp et al., 2019). When designing and implementing the assessments, we, as educators, can align the processes and make them fair.

Concluding Remarks

In conclusion, setting up systematic support on multiple tiers to enhance the improvement of the school or district is recommended. Such an approach should involve the utilization of the multi-tiered system of support (MTSS), a collection of services designed for students with different levels of learning needs (Hollingsworth, 2019). MTSS helps promote the development of professional learning communities (PLCs) for teachers in which teachers discuss and analyze effective practices and find solutions to problems (Schildkamp et al., 2019). Additionally, such procedures will allow the school to continue to receive feedback, reflect, and implement changes to meet students’ and the community’s needs as required (Kumar et al., 2013). By promoting a culture of shared responsibility for the outcomes and improvement of the school or district, in which teachers, principals, parents, and other stakeholders are engaged, a school leader can help the school move toward increased academic achievement and students’ well-being.

References

Hollingsworth, S. M. (2019). Multi-tiered system of supports as collective work: A (re) structuring option for middle schools. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 24(2), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.20429/cimle.2019.240204

Kumar, K. K., Jain, K. K., & Tiwary, R. R. (2013). Leadership activities and their impact on creating knowledge in organizations. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 19-31.

Lambrecht, J., Lenkeit, J., Hartmann, A., Ehlert, A., Knigge, M., & Spörer, N. (2022). The effect of school leadership on implementing inclusive education: How transformational and instructional leadership practices affect individualized education planning. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 943-957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752825

Marsh, J. & Farrell, C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214537229

Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining and knowledge discovery, 10(3), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355

Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Ebbeler, J., & Pieters, J. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 283-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3

a:link {text-decoration: none;}a:visited {text-decoration: none;
}a:hover {text-decoration: underline;} a:active {text-decoration: underline;}

We’ll write everything from scratch

---

Instructions
You are asked to mentor a junior school leader in your school/district. As the mentor, prepare a guide that you can share with your mentee of instructional leadership, as to instruction, curriculum, and assessment that takes place in the school (or district) for continuous improvement. Your guide will contain headings and in-text citations of experts. Use the following points to organize your guide.

Evaluate leadership skills needed for effective instructional planning in PK-12 environments. (CLO 1)

Critique professional learning strategies for curriculum, instruction, and assessment in PK-12 environments. This critique may include the challenges to continuous improvement for a school. (CLO 2)

State what data analytics you would recommend that would express organizational data of student achievement on the individual and school levels. (CLO 4)

Present how you would lead the development of data teams of teachers in your organization to develop organizational learning and knowledge sharing. (CLO 4)

Recommend assessment practices for and of learning in PK-12 environments (CLO 5)

Conclude with an outline of remarks on how to use multi-tiered systematic supports for continuous improvement. (CLO 3 & 6)

References: Please use 5 scholarly sources (need 2 more)
Article: Leadership Activities and Their Impact on Creating Knowledge in Organizations
Kumar, K. K., Jain, K. K., & Tiwary, R. R. (2013). Leadership activities and their impact on creating knowledge in organizations. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 19-31.
Leaders who have the power to incite and influence knowledge creation activities in any organization are at a natural advantage in their ability to play a central role in the process of knowledge creation.

Article: How Leaders Can Support Teachers with Data-Driven Decision Making: A Framework for Understanding Capacity Building
Marsh, J. & Farrell, C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269-289.
Develops a framework for understanding how to build teacher capacity to use data, specifically informing what practices administrators might employ and how these mechanisms may build teacher knowledge and skills.

Article: How School Leaders Can Build Effective Data Teams: Five Building Blocks for a New Wave of Data-Informed Decision Making
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C., Ebbeler, J., Pieters, J. (2019) How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 283-325. https://doi-org.proxy1.ncu.edu/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3
This study aims at exploring what types of leadership behaviors are applied to support data use in data teams, especially on pages 283-285 and 321-324.

Last Completed Projects